Skip to main content

Legal FAQ: Operational & Technical Questions

Deployment & Control

Who deploys the Vault smart contracts - Octant, or each Capital Provider?

Capital Providers deploy their own vault smart contracts using Octant's standardized templates.

Deployment Process

Capital Providers initiate deployment through Octant's interface, configuring parameters like accepted tokens, yield strategies, and allocation percentages. The protocol then deploys the vault contracts according to these specifications, with the Capital Provider maintaining administrative control from inception.

This approach ensures Capital Providers have direct ownership and control of their contracts while benefiting from Octant's audited, standardized infrastructure. Octant provides the templates and deployment mechanism, but each Capital Provider's vault is a separate, independent smart contract they control.

Implications

Since Capital Providers deploy their own contracts, they bear responsibility for configuration choices and operational decisions. Octant cannot access or modify Capital Provider vaults after deployment, reinforcing the non-custodial architecture.

This model provides Capital Providers with sovereignty over their infrastructure while ensuring security through battle-tested templates.

Communications & Disclosures

How should Capital Providers communicate their funding rounds to stay compliant?

Most Capital Providers find it beneficial to emphasize ecosystem development and community benefit while avoiding investment terminology.

Most Used Language

Capital Providers often focus on terms like "ecosystem funding," "grant allocation," "community support," and "public goods funding." They describe activities as "supporting builders," "enabling development," or "sustaining infrastructure" rather than generating returns.

They frame participation as "contributing to ecosystem growth" and rewards as "recognition for community participation" rather than investment returns, emphasizing the charitable or developmental purpose of allocations.

Avoided Language

Capital Providers typically avoid terms suggesting investment returns, profit opportunities, or passive income. Phrases like "earn yield," "investment opportunity," or "financial returns" could trigger securities regulations. Similarly, they avoid promising or projecting financial outcomes.

Clear Disclosures

Capital Providers might want to include explicit statements that participation is for ecosystem support, not investment purposes, and clarify that any rewards are for active participation in governance and allocation decisions. They document the non-commercial, community-benefit nature of the program, too.

Practical Messaging

By focusing communications on impact metrics, projects funded, and ecosystem growth rather than financial metrics, the sustainable funding model is highlighted rather than yield generation capabilities.